When
07:42. Early enough to forget, specific enough to prove.
Evidence analysis
What breaks the case?
A good detective trusts facts, timestamps, and the suspicious person who logged breakfast—not a persuasive meow.
SELECT PRIMARY CLUE
How do we know the cat ate?
DETECTIVE'S CONCLUSION
Case remains open.
Detective Pupa is examining the kitchen and refusing to rule herself out.
INVESTIGATINGClue board
The breakfast triangle.
Every kitchen mystery connects three facts. Lose one, and the cat gains plausible deniability.
Which cat
Mochi. Despite testimony from a nearly identical hungry witness.
What landed
One pouch. Not “some food.” Not “probably breakfast.” Evidence.
Investigation protocol
Solve it in three taps.
No corkboard required. The case closes when the household can see the same small receipt.
Name the suspect.
Choose the cat before an innocent sibling is blamed.
Record the bowl.
Meal, portion, and time become useful evidence.
Close the case.
The next caregiver sees the answer before opening another pouch.
— Detective Pupa, Licensed Snack Investigator
Case status
Fed at 07:42.
Mystery solved.
The suspect remains adorable, hungry, and likely to reoffend before dinner.